Friday, May 2, 2014

Just in!


Farm Bureau again calls for second draft of food safety rules


April 29, 2014-With the understanding that significant changes will have to be made to the Food and Drug Administration's Food Safety Modernization Act proposed rule for animal feed, Farm Bureau is again urging officials to put a second draft of the proposed rule out for public comment. 

"Given the complexity of the proposed rules, the current process of responding to comments on this draft rule with a final rule as a next step does not allow FDA to craft a sound and operable food safety framework.  An interim step, such as a second draft rule or interim final rule, is needed to work through the regulatory process with adequate stakeholder input," Farm Bureau wrote in recent comments.

Further, the second draft of all the FSMA-related proposed rules should be made available for thorough review as to how they are intended to work together, according to Farm Bureau. 
"FDA says that five rules comprise the core of its risk-based framework-produce safety, the Foreign Supplier Verification Program, third-party audit certification and preventative controls for human food and for animal feed.  Because all five rules contain overlapping provisions that together affect our members both directly and indirectly, it is critical that they be evaluated in context as a complete package," Farm Bureau said.

The organization also submitted detailed comments on the specifics of the animal feed rule. 
Farm Bureau's central concern with parts of the proposed animal feed rule (and the other proposed FSMA rules) is that they are significantly more onerous than Congress intended when it approved the underlying law establishing a risk-based food and feed safety system.  Among the feed safety issues Farm Bureau addressed are the definition of "farm," exemptions for low-risk activities associated with raw agricultural commodities (RACs) other than produce, and preventive controls requirements. 
While the organization appreciates FDA's recognition of farms as appropriately exempt from facility registration in general and in regard to this rule specifically, the farm definition is too limited to encompass other normal farm activities, including feed manufacturing on a limited scale. 

"Particularly in geographically isolated areas or locations where only a small number of farms are present, it is not unusual for a farm to add value to grains and other feedstuffs grown on its operation by mixing animal feed that can then be sold to neighboring farms," Farm Bureau said. In a handful of areas that don't have sufficient retail feed distribution, like Alaska, for example, purchasing feed from a neighboring farm might be the only way for a farmer to feed his livestock. 

Farm Bureau noted its agreement with FDA on the agency's intent to exempt facilities that store RACs other than fruits and vegetables from requirements that would be established within its proposed current good manufacturing practices regulation and its proposed preventative controls regulation. 
- See more at: http://fbnews.fb.org/Templates/Article.aspx?id=38710#sthash.UhiyroOO.dpuf

No comments:

Wind Generation Benefits Farmers, Rural Communities and Environment Op-Ed by Robert Giblin Washington—U.S. ener...